For this reason, i minimal our very own analyses to participants‘ perceptions into homosexual some one, instead of certain emotions contrasting between homosexual everyone

Extremely Puerto Ricans go after some translation of the Religious culture. Provided Christianity’s position into homosexuality once the a wicked lives, this is not surprising locate an effective negative relationship anywhere between religiosity and sexual prejudice (Diaz, 1998; Provider, 1995). Moreover, we expected whether or not religiosity you’ll improve sexual prejudice from the increasing participants‘ moral resistance to activate having homosexual individuals and you can/otherwise understand people connections with homosexual anyone as the confident. Nonetheless, an architectural model with religiosity predicting sexual prejudice alongside the most other studies details is found to be unreliable and you will volatile. For this reason, we do not believe religiosity is the operating factor for everyone most other investigation parameters . If you’re an input to lessen individuals‘ religiosity try unethical, i do highly recommend unlock discussions out-of Christianity’s posture into the intimate direction instead of homosexual habits contained in this religious options (Choice, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). These things may eliminate Puerto Rican’s negative perceptions for the homosexual people and you can girls by eliminating the focus off stigma from the homosexual individual in order to a specific sexual choices.

Ultimately, we located no sex differences in the relationships anywhere between sexual prejudice in addition to research parameters. However, the absence of intercourse variation is on account of all of our dimensions regarding sexual bias. The difference into the items posts within ATL and you can ATG subscales create precise evaluations between them subscales unfeasible. Prior studies looking gender differences in attitudes toward homosexuality modified new ATLG product text becoming the same apart from the brand new site group (i.e., “[Male/Female] homosexuality was an excellent perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). Conversely, possibly the variations in intimate bias for our studies inhabitants is not due to an intercourse dichotomy but so you can variations across sex jobs (Sakalli, 2002). People having higher salience in the machismo and in their attitudes from manliness is to promote greater intimate prejudice certainly one of boys (Cunningham, 1998). Future search should explore just how product text, social philosophy, and you can gender variations ong Puerto Ricans.

Nonetheless, contrasting between our very own design in addition to alternate model recommend that religiosity, self-confident skills having gay anyone, and you can number of affairs having gay males and you will lesbian predicted sexual prejudice better than the new approach causal route

Our very own studies has several limits. First, new study’s get across-sectional data restricted the company temporal buying of our variables. Coming research is always to mention the latest causal relationship between the investigation details. 2nd, economic and you can financing limits reduced our capacity to collect a bigger decide to try. A larger sample which is often separated in haphazard halves may accommodate additional improvement are produced on one 1 / 2 of the brand new shot, when you are evaluation the fresh new completely-changed design about almost every other arbitrary half of. 3rd, studies results may be non-generalizable for Puerto Rican low-college populations. Although people appeared encouraged to be involved in the research, early in the day browse located people who have reasonable instructional attainment often rating highest to the intimate prejudice (Herek, 2002). 4th, i failed to find out in the event the professionals interacted with gay men otherwise lesbians exactly who self-expose the intimate positioning or if perhaps it thought some men and you may women was basically homosexuals. Fifth, our inability to evaluate how many students absent inside for each and every class room from inside the questionnaire limits the fresh review from possible coverage biases. Nonetheless, because research collection happened early in the brand new session, we feel the chances of dropouts and you may people perhaps not planning lecture could have reduced. Ultimately, religiosity’s effect on sexual bias will probably be worth greater exploration. Our study was struggling to assemble information about participants‘ spiritual associations. Given the diversity of Christian living (85% Roman Catholic and you may fifteen% Protestant and other; CIA Industry Factbook (2005)), future education should talk about whether or not religiosity’s influence on sexual prejudice may vary because of the religious way of life.