In order to compare the next hypothesis, we very first recoded, per of the things that on position scale, this new portion of answers you to definitely reveal when the husbands reduce, equivalent or even more score, specifically, reputation, which have hypogamy, which means husbands enjoys down updates than wives, homogamy, definition equal standing, and you will hypergamy, definition husbands having large position than simply wives. To the prospective connection of nation, analyses was in fact high inside education (X 2 =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you can financial impact away from a prospective splitting up (X dos =nine.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Research indicated that, having Foreign language people, there can be much more studies hypogamy, while to own Dominican participants there clearly was a lot more education homogamy. In regards to the financial points if there is divorce, since there is way more homogamy for Spanish members, there clearly was a great deal more hypergamy to possess Dominicans (find Shape step 1).

Having prior marriages or not was not associated so you can differences in standing. About the prospective connection ranging from condition and you may decades married, tall connections was basically utilized in fitness (X 2 =fourteen.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and even though to have people y is out there (forty.4%, each), for couples y prevails (43.4%). In other words, on classification with additional ages partnered, husbands possess straight down health updates. With https://datingranking.net/de/std-dating-sites-de/ children away from prior marriages and achieving youngsters out-of latest relationships don’t somewhat affect reputation.

In the share, the new analyses concerning the 2nd theory showed that as opposed to all of our standard, the largest element related in order to updates is the country.

Univariate evaluation revealed significant differences in foundation step 1 (F=5

To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).

Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks‘ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.

Eventually, hypogamy things inside The country of spain obtained significantly lower than hypogamy issues within the Dominican Republic

Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks‘ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.

Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks‘ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).