Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you can Peoples Choices, 29(2), 119�126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot off attachment inside the peoples mating. Breakdown of General Therapy, 4(2), 186�204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Web sites paradox reviewed. Log away from Societal Factors, 58(1), 49�74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal tech you to definitely decreases public engagement and psychological really-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.

The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization additionally the design out-of fulfillment inside the romantic dating

Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Sphere, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, time, and time of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Current Populace Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies out of intimacy, interests, and you will partnership: Evaluation the latest assumptions of your triangular principle off love. Emotional Accounts, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impact finest regarding the starting bad: Social comparisons within close relationships. Record out of Personality and you can Social Mindset, 87(1), 80�95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Journal away from Identity and you can Social Therapy, 97(1), 74�87.

Intrasexual vigilance: New implicit cognition out of romantic rivalry

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can glamorous selection: The fresh changed psychology out of matchmaking fix. Advancement and you can Peoples Choices, 29(5), 343�349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential research off conflict and you may agreement from inside the troubled and you can nondistressed relationship partners. Diary regarding Consulting and you can Scientific Psychology, 49(4), 554�567.

McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Environmentally friendly, A. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Dating development online: What’s the big destination? Log out of Social Items, 58(1), 9�30.

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-investigations intentions during the personal relationships: A style of global enhancement and you can particular verification. Within the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents on the study of couple interaction (pp. 32�58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College or university Push.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-specialist bond from the contact lens away from accessory idea. Psychotherapy: Principle, Lookup, Habit, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh personal keeping track of program: Enhanced awareness to personal signs as the a transformative reaction to public exception to this rule. During the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh social outcast: Ostracism, public exception to this rule, getting rejected, and you can intimidation (pp. 213�226). Ny, NY: Therapy Push.

Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). dating atheist Around the globe and specific relational habits in the contact with personal connections. Journal out of Personality and Personal Psychology, 80(4), 613�631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you may recommendations trying for the close matchmaking. Identification and Personal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you may particular accessory representations during the adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Diary Out-of Personal And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you will relationship maintenance elements. From inside the J. Harvey & Good. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic personal relationships: Fix and you can enhancement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A. D. (2000). Projection in person effect one of partners due to the fact a purpose of the fresh new resemblance inside their common experience. Identification And you can Public Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Results of salience away from extrinsic advantages into the preference and you can enjoying. Record regarding Personality and you will Social Psychology, 38(3), 453�460.